Epos Technology Ltd. v. Pegasus Technologies Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WILLIAM M. NICKERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for a more definite statement. Paper No. 17. The motion is fully briefed. Upon review of the pleadings and the applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6) and that Defendant’s motion will be denied.
Plaintiff is an Israeli technology company that, since its inception in 2003, has worked to develop advanced digital positioning technology. Opp’n, Decl. of Oded Turbahn (Turbahn Decl.) ¶2. Recently, Plaintiff developed two products…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- SanDisk Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Pharma Ag and Novartis International Pharmaceutical Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc. v. Wical Ltd. P'shipCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bradley v. Progress Residential Property Manager, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Sukumar v. International Olympic CommitteeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. v. Wical Limited PartnershipDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018