Legal Opinion
Sukumar v. International Olympic Committee
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 1, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00215Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PONANI SUKUMAR, an individual, Case No.: 21cv215-GPC(AGS) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER 14 INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC JURISDICTION WITHOUT LEAVE COMMITTEE, an international non- 15 TO AMEND profit, non-governmental organization; 16 and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, [Dkt. No. 11.) 17 Defendant. 18 19 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of 20 Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), and 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 11.)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.