Legal Opinion

Furr's Supermarkets, Inc. v. Bethune

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2001No. 00-0846PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Enoch

joined by Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justices HECHT, OWEN and JFFFERSON.

In this case the trial court did not assess court costs against Marthana Bethune, the losing party, and for Furr’s, the prevailing party, as Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 131 requires.1 The trial court relied on Rule 141, which permits a “good cause” exception to Rule 131 that is “to be stated on the record.”2 Furr’s asserts that the “good cause” the trial court stated on the record was not good cause as a matter of law, and therefore, the trial court abused its discretion. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Christiansen v. PrezelskiTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Englander Co. v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Schafer v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Housing Authority of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Roberts v. WilliamsonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Bennett v. CochranTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. West Beach Marina, Ltd. v. Erdeljac, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  5. Sparks v. Booth, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API