Legal Opinion
Kim v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 14, 2006No. Civil Action 06-103(RMC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Calvin Kim 1 filed a pro se Complaint against the United States, alleging that beginning with tax year 1999, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) “recklessly, intentionally, or by reason of negligence disregarded” various provisions of Title 26 of the U.S.Code in connection with the collection of federal tax. Compl. ¶¶ 1 & 7. This Complaint is among the scores of nearly identical pro se complaints filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia over the past year seeking a refund, damages, and injunctive relief against further…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hines v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- DePolo v. Ciraolo-KlepperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Lundberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Depolo V.ciraolo-klepperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Hines v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.