Legal Opinion
Hines v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2009No. Civil Action 08-0914 (PLF)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed suit against defendants on the ground that levies attached by the Internal Revenue Service to his retirement benefits and other property were unlawful. The United States has since counterclaimed against plaintiff to reduce plaintiffs allegedly unpaid taxes to a judgment and for a penalty against plaintiff for advancing what it contends is frivolous litigation. This matter is now before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendants’ counterclaim, plaintiffs motion to strike the United…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boritz v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Justice v. KoskinenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States v. BoyceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Bowers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Bowers v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.