Legal Opinion

Shevchynski v. City of Eugene

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 25, 1998No. 16 94 04823; CA A88899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in a writ of review proceeding that set aside an order of the City of Eugene that enforced the city’s land use code against petitioners. The court concluded that the city had not adequately conducted the administrative hearings at which petitioner Shevchynski was found liable for violating the code. Petitioners cross-appeal, contending that the trial court erred when it granted defendants’ objections to petitioners’ cost bill without conducting a hearing.

The record before us reveals the following facts: In 1981, petitioner Shevchynski contracted to purchase…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. City Council of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Shipp v. County of MultnomahCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Magar v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Hunt v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Kleikamp v. Board of Commissioners of Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Spivak v. MarriottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API