Legal Opinion

Chenall v. Palmer Brick Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1903PublishedCited by 104 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Reid. City court of Atlanta. May 15, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtLamar, J.

The plaintiff, having been injured by the fall of a brick arch, brought suit against the defendant, alleging, and offering evidence tending to show, that it was liable to him because it had put him to work in an unsafe place under an arch that had been unskillfully constructed, and that he did not know of its condition, and could not have discovered the defect by the exercise of ordinary care. The defendant denied all of the contentions on the part of the plaintiff, and offered evidence to the effect that the plaintiff had no business at the place where he was injured; that he was not there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kaples v. OrthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Hollinshead v. Town of LincolntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Southern Bauxite Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. FullerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Yonge v. KinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  5. Keith v. Walker Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1888

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Maloy v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. May Department Stores Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API