Legal Opinion
Armour & Co. v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 6, 1929No. 19021PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) It does not appear that the allegations with reference to the State and Federal pure-food laws have any actual bearing upon the case as laid. The instant case is not one of adulteration; it is one of negligence- in the preparation and handling of food products. The purpose and intent of subsection 5 of section 2103 of the Civil
*231Code (1910), and of the very similar provisions of the Federal statute mentioned in the petition, was to define what was meant by adulteration as prohibited by the statute, and the particular subsection 5 of the code-section refers…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Hudgins v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Watson v. Augusta Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. DannemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Donaldson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Georgia-Alabama Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Coleman v. Dublin Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Criswell Baking Co. v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Alford v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.