Legal Opinion

Todd v. Bettingen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 25, 1906No. Nos. 14,761-(82)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin •county, Dickinson, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

■-JAGGARD, J.

In this case the plaintiff and appellant and the defendant and •respondent owned two elevator companies. In consequence of negotiations between them the plaintiff agreed in North Dakota to transfer his stock in the one elevator company to the defendant, in consideration •of the transfer by the defendant to him of the defendant’s stock in the other company and of the additional transfer to him through the defendant of a certain elevator situated on a railroad right of way in Dresden, North Dakota. Pursuant to that agreement the stock held by •each party, respectively, was…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. Ellis v. CaryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Estate of KesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Clark v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Pond v. SheeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Todd v. BettingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Kennedy v. BurnsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Todd v. BetttngenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. Durham v. DoddArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Pfuhl v. SabrowskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API