Legal Opinion

In re Wernick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1987PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee moves for an order confirming the Hearing Panel’s report recommending that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year from October 9, 1986, or until the expiration of his period of probation, whichever is longer.

Respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law on March 27, 1967 in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Judicial Department. On a date not specified in the record, he was indicted in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York,…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. In re RichterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. In re SafranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. In re CowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. In re LangbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re OshatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re RoemmeltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. In re MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. In re NedickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API