Legal Opinion

Nebel v. Sullivan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1929No. Docket No. 67, Calendar No. 33,777PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.

In the bill of complaint filed in this cause the plaintiff, Richard W. Nebel, is seeking an accounting from the defendants Thomas G. Sullivan, Marcella A. Sullivan, and Elizabeth Sullivan Pelton. The defendant Charles W. Harrah filed a cross-bill wherein he charges fraudulent misrepresentations by the defendant Thomas G. Sullivan, in consequence of which the defendant Charles W. Harrah seeks to have the transaction set aside out of which the plaintiff, Nebel, claims the profits arose incident to which he seeks an accounting. The relief sought in the cross-bill was granted in the circuit court…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schigur v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Case v. HarrahMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API