Legal Opinion

Case v. Harrah

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1931No. Docket No. 102, Calendar No. 35,321PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff files his bill herein as receiver against defendant for an accounting, to compel a refund of money paid for taxes, to cut off by foreclosure and sale defendants’ rights in the timber in question, and for other relief. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Defendant Harrah entered into a written contract with Thomas G. Sullivan as follows:

“This agreement made this fourteenth day of August, nineteen hundred twenty, between Thomas G. Sullivan, a widower of Munising, Michigan, and Charles W. Harrah, of Detroit, Michigan.
“Witnesseth: The said Sullivan hereby agrees to sell and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nebel v. SullivanMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sarchet v. RoachWyoming Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API