Legal Opinion

Baez v. Target Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 20, 2015No. Case No. 13 C 4258PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

John Robert Blakey, United States District Judge

This cases arises from a fall at a Target parking lot. Plaintiff Marilyn Baez sustained injuries from the fall and has brought a single-count complaint [2-1] against Defendant Target Corporation based on its purported negligence.

Defendant has moved for summary judgment [35]. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.

I. Legal Standard

Summary judgment is appropriate if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Spurting v. C…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Spurling v. C & M Fine Pack, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. CTL Ex Rel. Trebatoski v. Ashland School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Wells v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walker v. Macy's Merch. Grp., Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  2. Knauss v. Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburgers of New York, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Walgreen Co. v. Panasonic Healthcare Corporation of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  4. Walker v. Wal-Mart StoresDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API