Potter v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Wilson, O. J.

The facts in this case appear in 164 Minn. 213, 204 N. W. 928. The trial court’s order previously granting defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante on the ground that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish defendant’s liability was reversed.

Defendant appealed from an order denying a motion for a new trial based on: (1) Verdict contrary to law; (2) verdict not justified by the evidence; (3) excessive damages; and (4) errors in the charge.

The trial court denied the motion as to the last two grounds, and in his memorandum indicated a lack of accord with the views of…