Legal Opinion

Potter v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 1925No. 24,738PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Action to recover for the loss of household furniture destroyed by fire. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $1,156. Defend ant made the usual alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or for a new trial. The plaintiff has appealed from an order granting the motion for judgment.

Whether a verdict can be sustained is usually determined, by the evidence tending to support it. Anderson v. City of St. Cloud, 133 Minn. 467, 158 N. W. 417. But, in a case of this kind involving the source of the destructive fire, we must look also to the evidence tending to show an equal or greater…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Sash & Door Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Babcock v. Canadian Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. McCool v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Baxter v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Lares v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dumbeck v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Potter v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Caskey v. LewandowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API