Legal Opinion

Gustafson v. Gustafson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 1904No. Nos. 13,817—(58)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Wright county, Giddings, J., granting a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Plaintiff executed and delivered to defendants, his children, on September 2, 1902, a deed of certain real property owned by him, and on May 15, 1903, brought this action to set it aside, on the ground that it was procured from him by fraud. The trial court found the allegations of fraud not true, and ordered judgment for defendants. Subsequently, upon motion, based in substance and effect on the ground that *140the findings were not sustained by the evidence, the court granted a new trial, from which defendants appealed.

The deed of the property from plaintiff to his children was without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prescott v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  2. Lamprey v. LampreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. Shea v. HynesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buck v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Hull v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Thill v. FreiermuthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Potter v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API