Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 6, 1988No. PR 3006; CA A45577PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSSMAN,

In this will contest, the personal representative of the decedent’s estate appeals the trial court’s determination that the decedent’s will was void as a product of an insane delusion. We reverse.

Respondents are three of the four children 1 of Richard Dillon, who executed his holographic will in California in 1984, and two weeks later, on the advice of an attorney who had reviewed the will, executed a codicil. Dillon left nothing to his children and made statements about them in his will. With regard to Sarah, the will states:

“The last time we met she declared that she wished I would…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sanders v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Matter of Estate of YettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Enders v. ParkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Estate of Kottke v. ParkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Matter of Estate of KillenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. M.I. Marshall & Ilsley Trust Co. v. McCannonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API