D. L. Stern Agency, Inc. v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge,
Four motions have been made by the defendant: (1) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim; (2) to strike certain matters from the complaint as redundant, etc.; (3) for a bill of particulars; (4) in the alternative to the bill, for leave to take the plaintiff’s deposition before answer.
Although originally addressed to the entire complaint, the motion to dismiss as to the corporate plaintiff has been withdrawn, and is asserted now only against the individual plaintiff.
Two causes of action are alleged in the complaint, the first on behalf of both plaintiffs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rochester Lantern Co. v. Stiles & Parker Press Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Paige v. . FaureNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Alabama Independent Service Station Ass'n v. Shell Petroleum Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1939
- People v. . GluckNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Griffin v. Brooklyn Ball ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Mitchell v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
- Jones v. Pepsi-Cola CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1963
- York Blouse Corp. v. Kaplowitz Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Dreskin v. ZinkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.