Legal Opinion
York Blouse Corp. v. Kaplowitz Bros.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 17, 1953No. 1324PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
This was an action for the purchase price of certain merchandise alleged to have been sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. The defense pleaded was that the goods were shipped to defendant under an agreement that they could be returned and that they were returned. The secretary-treasurer of plaintiff corporation was its sole’ witness in chief and during the course of his testimony he stated that about the time the order for the goods was taken plans were under consideration for liquidation of plaintiff corporation. Defendant’s counsel then elicited from this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. All American Bus Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
- Brown v. ChristmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Kilbourn v. Western Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bell v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- National Motor Service Co. v. WaltersIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation (North America), Inc. v. National Railroad PassengerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Overseas Trading Company SA v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Kelly Adjustment Co. v. BoydDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.