Legal Opinion

E. F. Drew & Co. v. Southern Grocery Stores, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 4, 1935No. 189PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

On April 8, 1929, the plaintiff contracted to sell to the defendant a kind of colored oleomargarine, known as “Spredit,” at an agreed price of twenty-six cents per pound. On June 8, 1929, Rogers Inc., a fully owned subsidiary of the defendant conducting a number of stores in which the commodity was to be sold, addressed a letter to the plaintiff expressing doubt as to the advisability of carrying forward the contract because of the heavy license fees required to be paid for the sale of the commodity under a federal statute, which license fees…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Grone v. Economic Life Ins. Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Superior Tube Co. v. Delaware Aircraft Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  3. Salisbury v. Credit Service, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937
  4. McGrath Attorney General v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  5. Rodek v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API