Legal Opinion

McGrath Attorney General v. Dravo Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 26, 1950No. 10124_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

This is a suit by the Attorney General of the United States, as successor to the Alien Property Custodian, to recover accrued royalties alleged to have vested in the United States by virtue of Vesting Order Number 201, 8 F.R. 625, 1 issued pursuant to the Trading With the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. 411, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1 et seq.

On May 19, 1937, the defendant, Dravo Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, entered into a written contract with Ludwig Kort, a resident of Hanover, Germany, under which Kort, as holder of two United States letters patent for a ship…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mellon EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Gladowski v. FelczakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Craighead v. SwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Synthetic Patents Co. v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  5. E. F. Drew & Co. v. Southern Grocery Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Deemer Steel Casting Co. v. Lebanon Foundry & MacHine Co. (In Re Deemer Steel Casting Co., Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1990
  2. L. D. Caulk Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953
  3. A. Gusman, Inc. v. McGrathDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1950
  4. A. Gusmer, Inc. v. McGrath Atty. GenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API