Legal Opinion

Shakespeare Co. v. Silstar Corp. of America, Inc.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided September 24, 1992No. Civ. A. 3:90-1695-19PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHEDD, District Judge.

Shakespeare Company (“Shakespeare”), a manufacturer and distributor of fishing rods, is the owner of a federally registered trademark for fishing rods consisting of a whitish-translucent, or clear, tip portion of the rod, combined with an opaque rod base. Shakespeare uses this mark on a variety of types of rods it markets under its “Ugly Stik” line of rods. Shakespeare commenced this action to enjoin Silstar Corporation of America, Inc.’s (“Silstar”) attempt to market a fishing rod known as the “Sil-star Power Tip Crystal” rod, which has a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shakespeare Company v. Silstar Corporation of America, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  2. Shakespeare Company v. Silstar Corporation of America, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  3. Shakespeare Co. v. Silstar Corp. of America, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996
  4. Dowbrands, L.P. v. Helene Curtis, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  5. Villa Enterprises Management Ltd. v. Fed. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API