Legal Opinion

Luster v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1942No. 31430PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEbelly, J.

It is charged by the state that the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, “did on the 6th day of January, A. D. 1942, at and within the county of Otoe and the state of Nebraska, * * * then and there, by putting in fear, forcibly and by violence take from Randall Seyfer, money of value, with intent to rob and steal,” in contravention of the provisions of section 28-414, Comp. St. 1929. To an information so charging, the defendant interposed a plea of “not guilty.” A trial to a jury resulted in a conviction. From the judgment of the trial court overruling his motion for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Haines v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Norton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Green v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Baker v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Frank v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Fisher v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Kennedy v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. SegerNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bryant v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API