Legal Opinion

Haines v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1938No. 30360PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated as defendant, was proceeded against under section 28-1212, Comp. St. 1929, governing the issuance of an insufficient-funds check. The information is regular in form. The defendant was convicted of the offense by a jury in the district court for Hall county in September, 1937. Motion for a new trial was overruled. Defendant brings this proceeding in error.

The evidence establishes that defendant, a man 53 years of age, engaged in the live stock business since he was 19 years old, purchased horses for what was known as the *435Iowa Horse Sales Company; that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buckley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Williams v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Matters v. State,.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Beach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. O'Connor v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Onstott v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Sherrick v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. BoothMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. State v. EggersNebraska Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API