Legal Opinion

Tzovolos v. Wiseman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 22, 2011No. SC 18569PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

This appeal arises from two cases involving a complex commercial dispute over the ownership of and security interests in certain restaurant equipment. In the first action, which was brought in the judicial district of New Haven, the plaintiffs, Basile Tzovolos and Olympia Tzovolos, alleged that the defendants Scott Wiseman and Seawind, LLC (Seawind), 1 had breached a purchase and sale agreement for the equipment. The plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that: Wiseman and Seawind had failed to make payments for the equipment; Wiseman had breached a promissory note related to the sale…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartford/Windsor Healthcare Properties, LLC v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Socha v. BordeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Lord Family of Windsor, LLC v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. ShiversConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Town of Glastonbury v. Metro. Dist. Comm'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. Between Rounds Franchise Corp. v. EDGR Real Estate, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Dinardo Seaside Tower, Ltd. v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API