Legal Opinion
Prudence Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 18, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
This is a motion to strike from the answer certain denials as sham and frivolous and nine defenses as insufficient in law.
The action is upon a surety bond made by the defendants guaranteeing the completion of a building by the Central Park Properties, Inc., in accordance with the terms of a building loan agreement between it and the Prudence Company, Inc., the obligee named in the bond.
For a first cause of action the complaint alleges that the plaintiff and Central Park Properties, Inc., executed a building loan agreement by which the plaintiff agreed to *455lend to Central…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Patterson v. . MeyerhoferNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- National Surety Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Van Buren County v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Southern Surety Co. v. MacMillan Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. National Surety Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Prudence Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934