Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. National Surety Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 19, 1977No. 76 Civ. 494, 76 Civ. 515PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
In the second of the above entitled actions defendant bonding companies have moved, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment, and the Trustee in such action has cross-moved for partial summary judgment under such Rule for a determination that the notice and proof of loss requirements of the bonds issued by the defendants have been satisfied with respect to the Trustee’s first and second claims and that the notice provision in such bonds is not a bar to the Trustee’s third claim in his complaint.
Since last July…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brassil v. . Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Sukup v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Oklahoma Morris Plan Company, a Corporation, and Liberty Loan Corporation, a Corporation v. Security Mutual Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Oklahoma Morris Plan Co. v. Security Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1970
- Hansen & Rowland, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Franklin National Bank Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Estate of Jordan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Franklin Nat. Bank Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
- Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation v. Ernst & ErnstDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- In Re Franklin National Bank Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.