Legal Opinion

Prudence Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 6, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALS TON, District Judge.

By stipulation this cause was tried by a jury of one.

On September 24, 1929, the plaintiff and the Central Park Properties, Inc., entered into a building loan agreement, by the provisions of which the Prudence Company agreed to lend the sum of $6,650,009. This loan was to be secured by a bond and mortgage as a first lien upon premises on the south side of West Fifty-Ninth street in the city of New York.

The borrower 'agreed to erect, according to the plans and specifications submitted and approved in writing by the Prudence Company, a modern forty-story and basement…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Hudson v. Yonkers Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Trainor Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Carter v. KublerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Kidd v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prudence Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Lake View Trust & Savings Bank v. Filmore Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. In re Prudence Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API