Fisher v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, Chief Justice.
We have previously held that there is no right of appeal from a decree of adoption under 10 O.S.1951 Sec. 41 et seq., In re Hughes, 88 Okl. 257, 213 P. 79, and In re Davis, 206 Okl. 405, 244 P.2d 555.
It is, however, permissible' where other remedies are not provided as in this instance, to review in a proper action in the nature of certiorari, judicial proceedings of inferior tribunals, and such review by cer-tiorari not only applies to jurisdiction to act, but extends to the manner in which the jurisdiction of the inferior court was exercised, as applied in test of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Adoption of Howard Clay HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Morgan v. MorganMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- In Re DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Bangor Electric Company's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- In Re Benedictine Fathers of Sacred Heart MissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carder v. Court of Criminal AppealsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Prock v. District Court of Pittsburg CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Jones v. LovingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Marston v. MarstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Fisher v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958