Legal Opinion

McKoy v. Beasley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 2011No. COA09-1315PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where plaintiff’s original complaint seeking damages for medical negligence was devoid of any allegations complying with Rule 9(j) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, this defect could not be corrected by filing a second complaint following dismissal of the first complaint. Where plaintiff failed to raise a constitutional challenge to the constitutionality of Rule 9(j) in her pleadings, and failed to adequately develop that argument before the trial court, that argument is dismissed.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

On 2 December 1998, Arthur G. McKoy (“McKoy”) sought treatment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AssimosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Thigpen v. NgoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Brisson v. Kathy A. Santoriello, M.D., P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Ford v. McCainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Coker v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fintchre v. Duke Univ.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. Joines v. MoffittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Boyd v. RekucCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Ratledge v. PerdueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. Morris-Wilkins v. Davenport Auto ParkDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API