Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Assimos

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 2002No. 621A01PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals concluded that Rule 9(j) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure violates Article I, Section 18 of the North Carolina Constitution and the Equal Protection Clauses of the North Carolina and United States Constitutions. Anderson v. Assimos, 146 N.C. App. 339, 553 S.E.2d 63 (2001).

A constitutional issue not raised at trial will generally not be considered for the first time on appeal. State v. Nobles, 350 N.C. 483, 495, 515 S.E.2d 885, 893 (1999); Porter v. Suburban Sanitation Serv., Inc., 283 N.C. 479, 490, 196 S.E.2d 760, 767 (1973). Furthermore, the courts of this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Weil v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. State v. Fayetteville Street Christian SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. ElamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. Louk v. CormierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. ManessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  4. In Re StumboSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Sturgill v. Ashe Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API