Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Rekuc
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided March 15, 2016No. 15-780PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DILLON, Judge.
*228 Timothy S. Boyd ("Plaintiff") appeals from the trial court's order dismissing his medical malpractice claims. For the following reasons, we reverse.
I. Background
Plaintiff's complaint asserts claims for medical malpractice against Defendants Gregory M. Rekuc, M.D., and Raleigh Adult Medicine, P.A., contending that Defendants' failure to provide him with up-to-date vaccinations proximately caused his suffering from a number of maladies. His action was dismissed because he did not file his complaint with the certification required by Rule 9(j) of the Rules of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Thigpen v. NgoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Brisson v. Kathy A. Santoriello, M.D., P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Ford v. McCainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Brown v. Kindred Nursing Centers East, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Market America, Inc. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Vaughan v. MashburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Mkt. Am.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Robinson v. Halifax Reg'l Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- Robinson v. Halifax Reg'l Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020