Legal Opinion
Brookhill-Wilk 1, LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 11, 2003No. 02-1145PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
Brookhill-Wilk 1, LLC (“Brookhill”) appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissing its complaint after deciding, on motion for summary judgment, that Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (“Intuitive”) had not infringed the claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,217,003 (“the '003 patent”). Brookhill-Wilk 1, LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., 178 F.Supp.2d 356 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). We conclude that the district court erred in construing the limitation “remote location.” Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brookhill-Wilk 1, LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Lemelson Medical, Education & Research Foundation, Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
- McNeil-PPC, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP v. Mayne Pharma (USA), Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.