Legal Opinion

In Re Whichard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 24, 1970No. 703DC225PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mobeis, . J.

At the outset, we notice that the record on appeal contains no assignments of error, but the exceptions are listed. The brief of appellant does not refer to any assignment of error but refers only to the exceptions shown in'the record. The appeal is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with the rules of this Court. Trust Co. v. Henry, 267 N.C. 253, 148 S.E. 2d 7 (1966); Rule 28, Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. It does not appear that appellant was represented by court-appointed counsel either on appeal or in District Court. It does appear,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. DeBacker v. BrainardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. State v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DellingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. In Re AllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. In Re PottsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. RushCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API