State v. Tucker
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Judge.
Defendant, Joseph Edward Tucker, argues two assignments of error in his appeal. First, he contends there is insufficient evidence that he committed a second-degree sexual offense. Second, he argues the trial court erred in calculating his prior record level by equating his stay at a juvenile training school, now known as a youth development center, with a “sentence of imprisonment.”
For the reasons herein, we find no error in the second-degree sexual offense conviction but reverse and remand for sentencing pur poses. We note that defendant abandoned the part of his appeal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. IsraelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. StroudSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In the Matter of K.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- In re T.E.F.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- In Re O'NealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. BuffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.