Legal Opinion

Shpilberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

George Y. Shpilberg appeals from a judgment holding him liable to the brokerage firm of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, in the sum of $22,300, as damages for breach of an alleged contract under which Shpilberg agreed to purchase $1,000,-000 face amount of TVA bonds at the price of $1,005 per thousand dollar bond. The circuit court made a summary determination that Shpilberg had breached the contract, and then conducted a trial on the issue of damages.

Shpilberg’s primary contention on this appeal is that the summary determination that he had breached the contract was error because there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Parts Co., Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Harry Rubin & Sons, Inc. v. Consolidated Pipe Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Town of Troy v. AMERICAN FIDELTY COMPANYSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  4. Tripp v. Pay 'N Pak Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Alderson v. Francis I. duPont & CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. ColeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Conagra, Inc. v. NierenbergMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lonnie Hayes & Sons Staves, Inc. v. Bourbon Cooperage Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
  4. Khoshnou v. PAINE, WEBBER, JACKSON ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Fowler v. Essex Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API