Legal Opinion
Byoung Suk an v. Victoria Fire & Casualty Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 17, 2015No. 2120 EDA 2014PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
SHOGAN, J.:
Appellant, Byoung Suk An, appeals from the order dated June 20, 2014, and entered June 23, 2014, denying his motion for summary judgment. 1 On appeal, Appellant challenges the trial court’s determination that the “named driver only” automobile policy issued to Zainab Walker (“Walker”) does not violate section 1718(c) of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (“MVFRL”), 75 Pa.C.S. § 1718(c), and is not contrary to public policy. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
On August 2, 2012, Appellant filed a complaint in the Montgomery County Court of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Williams v. Geico Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- McCormick v. Northeastern BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. ZeranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- French v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Verdini, A. v. First National Bank of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. DoonerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Rarick v. Federated Serv. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Safe Auto Insurance Co. v. Oriental-GuillermoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Nationwide Prop. & Casualty Ins. v. Castaneda, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.