Legal Opinion

Roslik v. Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1944No. Appeal, 148PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Appellant brought this action of trespass to recover for personal injuries sustained when he fell while stepping from a curb into a cross-walk within defendant municipality, alleging that defendant had negligently permitted the cross-walk to remain in a state of disrepair. As the sole assignment of error is the granting of judgment n.o.v. on defendant’s motion, the facts, with all the legitimate inferences to be di*awn from them, will be stated in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, who had the verdict below: German v. McKeesport City, 137 Pa. Superior Ct. 41, 8 A.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. German v. McKeesport City (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Canavan v. City of Oil CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Corporation of Borough v. NeffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  4. Good v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Henn v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burton v. TerryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Rodgers Et Vir v. Shaler Twp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Kennedy v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API