Legal Opinion
Fazio v. LEHMAN BROTHERS INC.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 19, 2002No. 1:02CV157, 1:02CV370, 1:02CV382, 1:02CV761, 1:02CV764, 1:02CV968, 1:02CV1018PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
MANOS, District Judge.
In each of these cases, the Defendants have filed motions to compel arbitration and stay proceedings. 1 (See Fazio Docket Nos. 38, 48 and 54; Glazer Docket Nos. 26 and 36; Visconsi Docket Nos. 23 and 35; Spitalieri Docket Nos. 11 and 12; Lopardo Docket Nos. 13 and 17; Savoca Docket Nos. 12 and 16; Bonutti Docket No. 13.) The parties have briefed these issues extensively. The arbitration issues overlap sufficiently to permit the Court to issue a single opinion applicable to all these cases.
For the following reasons, the motions to compel arbitration…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doris Deputy v. Lehman Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Deputy, Doris v. Lehman Brothers IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003