Lou Shaw Eastborne Productions, Inc. v. Richard Lindheim Michael Sloan Universal City Studios, Inc. Columbia Broadcasting Systems McA Television, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
Lou Shaw and Eastbourne Productions, Inc. (Shaw) appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of Richard Lindheim, Michael Sloan, and three entertainment corporations (defendants). On appeal, Shaw argues that the district court erred in finding that, as a matter of law, there was no substantial similarity between his script entitled “The Equalizer” and defendants’ pilot script for their “Equalizer” television series. Because a reasonable trier of fact could have found that the two works are substantially similar, Shaw argues, the district court erred in dismissing…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Martin Weiner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Smith v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- James W. Cleary v. News Corporation and Harpercollins Publishers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Waldman Publishing Corp. And Playmore Inc., Publishers v. Landoll, Inc., Martin Myers & James LandollCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. Penguin Books Usa, Inc., a Corporation Dove Audio, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.