Legal Opinion

City of Menard v. Coats

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1933No. 4047PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, Chief Justice.

The appellee, a minor, by his mother as next friend, filed this suit against the city of Menard and the Menard Irrigation Company to recover damages which it is alleged the plaintiff sustained in an irrigation ditch near the courthouse in the city of Menard.

The facts are, briefly stated, that the irrigation company had a canal about eighteen feet wide and about five feet deep which ran through the city of Menard and through the courthouse square. Some one had created a park there and as part of the improvements had erected a large water wheel about twenty feet in diameter,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Fort Worth v. WigginsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Wiggins v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. SimpsonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Manlove v. LavelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Miller v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Englehardt v. PhilippsOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. City of Tyler v. IngramTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Terrell Wells Health Resort, Inc. v. SevereidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Doran v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Lones v. Detroit, Toledo And Ironton Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API