Legal Opinion
State v. Fisk
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 10, 1996No. 93-545Published
1Opinion of the Court
682 A.2d 937 (1996)
STATE of Vermont
v.
James E. FISK.
No. 93-545.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
May 10, 1996.
Motions for Reargument Denied May 31, 1996 and June 28, 1996.
Peter R. Neary, Rutland County Deputy State's Attorney, Rutland, for plaintiff-appellee.
Robert Appel, Defender General, Henry Hinton, Appellate Defender, Montpelier, and James E. Fisk, pro se, for defendant-appellant.
Before GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ., and TEACHOUT, SUPR. J., Specially Assigned.
MORSE, Justice.
Defendant James Fisk appeals the district court's denial of his motion to withdraw a plea of nolo contendere. His…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.