Davis v. Marin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
Introduction
Plaintiff and appellant Christina Davis appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant and respondent Melody Marin, D.C. The issue on appeal is whether Dr. Marin was timely added as a defendant in the lawsuit. Concluding she was timely added as a defendant, we reverse the summary judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
1. Prelitigation events.
On December 6, 1996, Davis suffered multiple burns to her back when Dr. Marin, a chiropractor, utilized a muscle stimulator machine during a course of chiropractic treatment.
On December 7, 1996, Davis told…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- PMC, Inc. v. Saban Entertainment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Woo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Munoz v. PurdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Garrison v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Sparks Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Slatkin v. University of RedlandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Camarillo v. VaageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- McClatchy v. Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Knowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.