Legal Opinion
Knowles v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 25, 2004No. D043323PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
I
INTRODUCTION
Real parties in interest Serafina Labo (Serafina), Florence Crick (Florence), and John Labo (John), are the wife, daughter, and son, respectively, of the decedent Anatalio Labo (Anatalio).1 Real party in interest Nard Labo (Nard) is also a son of Anatalio and is mentally disabled. Serafina, Florence, John and Nard each brought a wrongful death claim against defendant Harry Knowles, alleging that Anatalio died as a result of Knowles's professional…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Massey v. Mercy Medical Center ReddingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Arroyo v. PlosayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Bhinder v. KF Ontario LLC CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Goodwin v. Pagano CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.