Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 16, 1998No. Civ. A. 97-11997-WGY, 97-10986-WGYPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

The formal correspondence (i.e., petitions and the orders thereon) between a pro se prisoner seeking habeas relief and a federal judge are necessarily somewhat strained, awkward, and sometimes confusing. On occasion, however, it is the prisoner who latches onto a viable legal concept and the judge who is confused. This is such an instance.

On April 29, 1997, Jose Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) filed his first petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Gonzalez v. United States, 97-10986-WGY, 1998 WL 195988 (“the first petition”). Within two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Piacentini v. LevangieDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  3. Norlander v. PlaskyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michael Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Michael Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API