Legal Opinion
Norlander v. Plasky
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 21, 1997No. Civil Action 96-11933-JLTPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TAURO, Chief Judge.
No objection having been filed to the Report and Recommendation entered by Magistrate Judge Bowler on May 1,1997, the court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation.
The captioned action is ordered dismissed.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET ENTRY # 7)
BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
On September 29, 1996, petitioner Michael L. Norlander (“petitioner”) filed this habeas corpus petition pro se pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Docket Entry # 3). This court, in accordance with Rule 4 (“Rule 4”) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Pablo Escoboza VegaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barke v. BergeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
- Gonzalez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Alves v. MatesansDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Pedreira v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Sifton v. North Adams, City ofDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.