Legal Opinion

North Carolina Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Kerly

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 14, 1926No. 7. Div. 608PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Action on a policy of life insurance. In several pleas defendant set up a breach of a condition of the policy to this effect, in general, that insured was in good health at the time of its delivery. To this defense plaintiff replied that defendant retained the first premium paid on the policy and delivered said policy with full knowledge of the fact pleaded by way of defense. This, on its face, was a good replication. But in proof of it plaintiff could only adduce evidence tending to show that defendant’s local agent had knowledge of the fact that the insured was not in good health at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Powell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. NewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. First Nat. Life Ins. Co. of America v. RectorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Bankers' Credit Life Ins. Co. v. AyresSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. New York Life Ins. Co. v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API