New York Life Ins. Co. v. McJunkin
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The question for decision is whether the policy was delivered or became the contract of insurance. If not, the court was in error in rendering judgment for the plaintiff.
The evidence is in material respects uncontradicted. The policy in evidence purported to insure the life of decedent, and the wife, plaintiff here, was the named beneficiary. That instrument was not in her possession, but was exhibited to the deposition of one of defendant’s executive officers. It is in the usual form of such contracts, was of date of March 23d, and taking effect as of the 11th day of March,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Cherokee Life Ins, Co. v. BrannumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- United States Life Insurance v. LesserSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Morford v. California Western States Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Mutual Savings Life Ins. Co. v. OsborneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. McGheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.