Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Arch Hurley Conservancy Dist.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1938No. 4366PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint in a suit for a declaratory judgment maintained by authority of Laws 1935, c. 143, and trial court rule 1935-143-1 promulgated pursuant thereto. Arch Hurley Conservancy District (hereinafter called the conservancy district) and its board of directors are the defendants. The defendant conservancy district was organized under Laws 1927, c. 45, Comp.St.1929, c. 30. Its due organization and the definition of its boundaries as prescribed by the act seem to be conceded.

The complaint discloses that its board of directors,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. State Ex Rel. Capitol Addition Bldg. Commission v. ConnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State v. IngallsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. Seward v. BowersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. County of Fresno v. MalmstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API