Legal Opinion

Seward v. Bowers

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1933No. 3897PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINN, Justice.

Appellant, a resident taxpayer and water user of Springer, N. M., sought to enjoin the appellees, the mayor and board of trustees of the town of Springer, from making, executing, and delivering to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation $37,500 revenue bonds for a loan of an equal amount, the bonds to be paid exclusively from net revenues to be derived by the municipality from the operation of its municipally owned waterworks system ; the money to be used in the betterment, replacement, and improvement of the present system.

The proposed bonds are to be issued pursuant to Laws…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Quill v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Shields v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. City of Albuquerque v. Water Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  4. City of Laporte v. Gamewell Fire Alarm Telegraph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Searle v. Town HaxtunSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Johnson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  4. Village of Deming v. Hosdreg CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State Ex Rel. State Park & Recreation Commission v. New Mexico State AuthorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API